News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
RAWA News


 

 

 

Add RAWA RSS Feed to Feedreaders



 




 


RAWA Photo Gallery
From RAWA Photo Gallery
 


Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on Amazon.com

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook


The Vancouver Sun, November 12, 2010

Harper’s flip-flop on Afghanistan

The US does not want any government that has a nationalist political agenda

By Murray Dobbin

We should have known it was too good to be true. Harper’s many, many repetitions of his government’s commitment to get all the troops out by July 2011 are well known. I think he may actually have meant it because by these repeated statements he framed the issue so strongly that all Canadians expected – and supported – the withdrawal.

Here’s what he said in an interview with Canwest last January:

“We will not be undertaking any kind of activity that requires a significant military force protection, so it will become a strictly civilian mission. We will continue to maintain humanitarian and development missions, as well as important diplomatic activity in Afghanistan. But we will not be undertaking any activities that require any kind of military presence, other than the odd guard guarding an embassy.”

Today the story changes, as it appears US President Obama is also preparing to change his mind about “drawing down” US troops from that poor country. In other words the war will go on and the pressure on NATO allies cranked up.

Harper now declares:

And just which gains would those be? Exactly what have Canadian troops accomplished after more than 160 deaths, hundreds of dead civilians, dozens of tortured innocents and $18 billion spent? Are Afghanistan and its citizens more secure? No. Is there any hope at all that the Karzai government – his election remains illegal with one of the most massive voting frauds in modern history standing unchallenged – will ever be anything but totally corrupt, beholden to war lords and guilty of protecting drug lords? Have we forgotten that is a government that passed a law making rape legal if committed by a woman’s husband? So much for the liberation of women.
The Vancouver Sun, Nov. 12, 2010

“I don’t want to risk the gains that Canadian soldiers have fought for and that they have sacrificed in such significant numbers for by pulling out too early if we can avoid that. I think if we can continue a smaller mission that involves just training, I think frankly that presents minimal risks to Canada but it helps us ensure that the gains we’ve made our continued … to truly ensure that the Afghan forces are able over the next couple of years to take over true responsibility for their security.”

And just which gains would those be? Exactly what have Canadian troops accomplished after more than 160 deaths, hundreds of dead civilians, dozens of tortured innocents and $18 billion spent? Are Afghanistan and its citizens more secure? No. Is there any hope at all that the Karzai government – his election remains illegal with one of the most massive voting frauds in modern history standing unchallenged – will ever be anything but totally corrupt, beholden to war lords and guilty of protecting drug lords? Have we forgotten that is a government that passed a law making rape legal if committed by a woman’s husband? So much for the liberation of women.

Afghanis don’t trust this awful government and they are as terrified of the police force as they are of the Taliban. They have a somewhat higher regard for the army but it is hard to tell why. I guess when your standards are – at least they don’t shoot me or steal from me – then the army looks good.

But the army after seven years of training still has a high desertion rate and is notoriously unprofessional, often refusing to fight.

It is impossible to separate the army from the corrupt and hated Karzai government. Why would a soldier be motivated and willing to die for a government he and the people detest? This army will never, ever take control o Afghanistan because the US and NATO are determined to thwart real democracy in the country. They are there – and intend to remain – for geo-political reasons and as part of their plan to control the oil and gas in the region. Their commitment to an authoritarian and illegitimate government completely undermines their goal of an effective Afghan army.

It isn’t a matter of training. It is a question of legitimacy. Poorly paid grunts observing billions of dollars going into the pockets of politicians, government officials and war lords will never be as motivated as the Taliban – driven by the zeal of expelling foreign occupiers.

If they really wanted democracy why would the US and Karzai establish electoral rules that banned political parties from running candidates? This virtually guarantees that the legislature – such as it is with few powers compared to Karzai’s executive power – is completely dysfunctional. Scores of individual representatives are incapable of coming together in enough numbers to put together and pass a legislative program. Indeed, it was planned to be ineffective. The US does not want any government that has a nationalist political agenda.

The situation is further complicated by the increasing anger felt towards the US because of the ever-increasing number of civilian casualties caused by their use of fighter bombers, helicopter gun ships and armed drones – in addition to heavy artillery and tanks. Ironically, once the Canadian contingent pulls out of Kandahar this slaughter of innocents will get worse as US troops replace our own. The Afghan army is inextricably associated with the US occupation.

Canada cannot help the people of Afghanistan. Since the day that the US decided to occupy that country, this has been the case. The “gains we have made” referred to by Harper are a total illusion. There is no happy ending for Afghans whether we stay or leave. Better that we leave and let them decide their own future – and use the money we save for something productive that does not further ruin our reputation as a peaceful nation.

Category: Warlords, US-NATO, HR Violations - Views: 4985


Related

08.11.2010: Afghanistan Among 23 Least Developed Countries
08.11.2010: For Afghan Wives, a Desperate, Fiery Way Out
04.11.2010: 229 Afghan civilians killed in October: official
04.11.2010: WikiLeaks urges U.S. to fully examine abuses
04.11.2010: Malali Joya: “Bravest woman in Afghanistan” spearheads anti-war movement
03.11.2010: Mounting evidence of British war crimes
03.11.2010: Any hope I had in the ballot box bringing change in Afghanistan is gone
01.11.2010: Afghan civilian deaths caused by allied forces rise
31.10.2010: AFGHANISTAN: Food Security Outlook, October 2010 to March 2011
28.10.2010: The evil side of America
26.10.2010: Iraq, Afghanistan among “most corrupt” nations
25.10.2010: NATO Airstrike Kills 15 in Afghanistan
24.10.2010: The Afghan Black Hole: Governance and Corruption
22.10.2010: BETTER IDEA: Bringing home 243 troops could pay for all higher education for Afghanistan this year
21.10.2010: Struggles Are A Way Of Life For Afghan Women
19.10.2010: Tribal militias accused of forcefully taking usher
19.10.2010: 80pc Balkh residents live in extreme poverty
16.10.2010: The war on Afghanistan: a crime against humanity
15.10.2010: Afghan War, Afghan Holocaust & Afghan Genocide 9th Anniversary - 4.9 million dead, 3.2 million refugees: report
13.10.2010: Civilian casualties doubled in north: UN
13.10.2010: Afghans say Nato “as bad as the Taliban”
13.10.2010: Afghanistan Air Strikes Up 172 Percent
12.10.2010: Afghan Warlords, a Larger Stability Threat Than Taliban
12.10.2010: Afghanistan going “from worse to worse”
12.10.2010: ICRC: Kandahar casualties reflect worsening security
11.10.2010: Afghan activist makes call in for end to “occupation” of her country
08.10.2010: Security contractors in Afghanistan “fund Taliban”
07.10.2010: Protesters rally against war in Afghanistan
06.10.2010: Afghan women’s rights leader says Obama no better than Bush
05.10.2010: War renders displacement, miseries to Afghans
05.10.2010: Nine children among 10 killed in Kandahar
04.10.2010: Afghan civilians killed in foreign air strike-police
04.10.2010: Afghanistan nine years on
04.10.2010: Relatives Tell of Civilians Killed by U.S. Soldiers
01.10.2010: Photos of dead Afghans were traded by U.S. soldiers, Army says
01.10.2010: Australian soldiers charged over civilian killings in Afghanistan
30.09.2010: Grisly allegations against U.S. soldier
30.09.2010: Thousands of Afghans displaced by fighting
30.09.2010: Most Canadians agree it’s time to leave Afghanistan: Global poll
29.09.2010: Outsourcing the Dirty War in Afghanistan
28.09.2010: AFGHANISTAN: Limited progress on maternal health
28.09.2010: An Excess of Corruption and a Deficit of Toilets: American and Karzai’s “Successes” in Afghanistan
26.09.2010: 20 % Increase in Birth Deformities in Afghanistan
25.09.2010: Laghman civilian deaths spark protest
23.09.2010: Twin blasts injure 19 in E. Afghanistan
23.09.2010: 64 killed in north on election day
20.09.2010: Residents happy as UK forces quit Sangin
19.09.2010: Blast Kills Eight Afghan Children

Latest

Most Viewed

Comments