News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
RAWA News


 

 

 

Add RAWA RSS Feed to Feedreaders



 




 


RAWA Photo Gallery
From RAWA Photo Gallery
 


Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on Amazon.com

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook


CounterPunch, December 13, 2009

The Poppy Pretext: Why the War on Drugs is Really a War on the Taliban

The cigarette industry spends tens of billions of dollars a year on marketing

By JULIEN MERCILLE

So Mr. Obama is getting ready to surge-again-in Afghanistan partly to fight opium trafficking. But an important report just released by the World Health Organization entitled The Global Tobacco Epidemic shows that Obama cannot possibly be waging a “war on drugs”-or else he would direct his attention towards tobacco executives and away from the Taliban [1].

Opium fields in Afghanistan
RAWA: Since 2001 the opium cultivation increased over 4,400%. Under the US/NATO, Afghanistan became world largest opium producer, which produces 93% of world opium.

Illegal drugs kill about 200,000 people every year, including deaths due to HIV/AIDS transmission through needles. Of this, opiates account for 100,000, a number recently used by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime to justify the targeting of Afghan drug traffickers and Taliban [2].

But according to the WHO, tobacco kills about 5.4 million people every year–1 in 10 adult deaths worldwide-and more than tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and malaria combined. Alcohol accounts for another 1.8 million deaths yearly. In the 20th century, the tobacco epidemic killed 100 million people-and during the 21st century, the number could reach one billion. Second-hand smoke alone kills three times more people (600,000) than illegal drugs.

However, tobacco industry leaders are treated very differently from the Taliban who, lest we forget, only capture about 4% of the value of Afghanistan’s drug industry, or $125 million per year according to UNODC. First, tobacco has not been made illegal, in fact it is the only legal consumer product which kills when it is used entirely as intended, meaning that around 500 million people alive today will die because of it. But although Western governments collect $110 billion in tobacco taxes each year, they only spend 0.3% of that on tobacco control. This is even if tobacco-related deaths result in lost economic opportunities, which in the United States are estimated at $92 billion a year, in addition to increasing health care costs by $81 billion annually. Worried about health care reform costs? Tackle smoking.

The cigarette industry spends tens of billions of dollars a year on marketing, but no one would think of giving the privilege to the Taliban of conducting an advertising campaign in the West for opium products. In developing countries, tobacco corporations now target women and teenagers and pressure governments to block marketing restrictions and tax increases, just as they did for decades in developed countries.

In the late 1990s, the “Tobacco Papers” were released as a result of legal action against cigarette manufacturers, comparable to the Vietnam War years “Pentagon Papers” [3]. Six million secret internal documents became available to the public, revealing and confirming much about their commercial strategies. For instance, their executives noted that they should not be too depressed about declining traditional markets because “there are areas of strong growth, particularly in Asia and Africa… It is an exciting prospect” (British American Tobacco chairman, 1990). Philip Morris stated that “Today’s teenager is tomorrow’s potential regular customer… The smoking patterns of teenagers are particularly important to Philip Morris.” As a result, by 2030, more than 80% of tobacco deaths will be in developing countries. As many as 100 million Chinese men currently under age 30 will die from tobacco use.

Russian state-controlled Channel One TV has broadcast a report containing allegations that US forces are involved in drug-trafficking from Afghanistan to Europe. It also highlighted the problem of drug abuse in the British army.
Sott.net, February 19, 2008

Another reason why there can’t be a “war on drugs” is that successive American governments have consistently used the least effective means to deal with the problem. A widely cited 1994 RAND study showed that targeting “source countries” is 23 times less effective than providing treatment for addicts domestically, the most effective method [4]. Rational policy-makers, at least over decades, should have shifted policy towards the most effective approach if truly concerned with fighting drugs. But the debate in the White House on drug policy in Afghanistan has oscillated between crop eradication (Bush) and interdiction and alternative crops (Obama). The range of establishment discourse is therefore limited to “source-country control”, the least effective option, reinforcing the point that officials are not interested in pursuing a “war on drugs”. Their motives lie elsewhere, namely, in fighting the Taliban and others who resist Washington’s hegemony, the “war on drugs” acting as mere pretext to justify those policies.

Julien Mercille is lecturer at University College Dublin, Ireland. He specializes in U.S. foreign policy and geopolitics. He can be reached at jmercille[at]gmail[dot]com.

Notes:

[1] WHO, Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2009. Data from the first report of this series, issued in 2008, was also used in this article.

[2] WHO, World Health Report, 2002. UNODC, Addiction, Crime and Insurgency, 2009.

[3] WHO, The Tobacco Industry documents (2nd edition), 2004.

[4] RAND, Controlling Cocaine: Supply Versus Demand Programs, 1994.

Category: Taliban/ISIS/Terrorism, US-NATO, Drugs - Views: 10800


Related

27.06.2009: Power of the Poppy
13.05.2009: Drug trade permeates Afghanistan
11.05.2009: Karzai’s brother threatened McClatchy writer reporting Afghan drug story
10.05.2009: Only small-time Afghan drug dealers serve time
10.12.2008: The CIA and Drugs
30.11.2008: Government cars ‘used to smuggle drugs’
24.11.2008: CIA, Heroin Still Rule Day in Afghanistan
28.11.2008: UN: Taliban could clear 500 million Dollar from 2008 drug trade
15.10.2008: How Deeply is the U.S. involved in the Afghan Drug Trade?
25.09.2008: Attorney of Kunduz: some authorities in Sher Khan Port involved in drug-trafficking with mafia
05.10.2008: Reports Link Karzai’s Brother to Heroin Trade
25.07.2008: Afghanistan president accused of protecting drug smugglers
30.06.2008: Turning Afghan Heroin Into Kalashnikovs
27.06.2008: U.N. Finds Afghan Opium Trade Rising
09.06.2008: Afghanistan growing drug trade will prolong conflict 'for years to come'
04.06.2008: The Business of Opium in Afghanistan: Drugs and Corruption
05.05.2008: Rampant depression, drugs scar Afghan population
20.04.2008: Afghan drugs and regional addiction rates
05.03.2008: UN: Afghanistan Should Hit Drug Lords With Links to the Government
20.02.2008: Kabul Today: No Trees, No Paved Roads, No Electricity, No Women in Sight --Only Drugs and Guns
17.02.2008: Russian state TV suggests USA involved in drug-trafficking from Afghanistan
03.01.2008: Drug addiction rising in Afghan children
02.01.2008: Drugs boom, continued violence in Afghanistan for 2008: NATO
16.11.2007: Opium amounts to half of Afghanistan's GDP in 2007, reports UNODC
22.08.2007: More than 100,000 Drug Dealers Identified in Afghanistan
27.09.2007: Senior officials linked to drug smuggling: Afghan VP

Latest

Most Viewed

Comments