News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
RAWA News


 

 

 

Add RAWA RSS Feed to Feedreaders



 




 


RAWA Photo Gallery
From RAWA Photo Gallery
 


Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on Amazon.com

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook


The Wall Street Journal, July 23, 2011

Report Finds Vast Waste in U.S. War Contracts

Panel Says Billion Was Misspent In Iraq, Afghanistan in 10-Year Period

By Nathan Hodge

The U.S. has wasted or misspent $34 billion contracting for services in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a draft report by a bipartisan congressional panel, the most comprehensive effort so far to tally the overall cost of a decade of battlefield contracting in America's two big wars.

The three-year investigation comes from the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, which was established by Congress in 2008.

Its final report, expected to be sent to Capitol Hill in the next few weeks, lays out in detail the failure of federal agencies to properly manage and oversee grants and contracts set to exceed a total of $206 billion by the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30.

US aid distribution

The draft report, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, identifies myriad instances of projects that were poorly conceived. They include a $300 million U.S. Agency for International Development agricultural development project with a "burn rate" of $1 million a day that paid Afghan farmers to work in their own fields.

It flags diversion of funds to insurgents, such as a subcontractor on a community-development project in eastern Afghanistan paying 20% of their contract to insurgents for "protection." And it touches on cases where the host government was unable to sustain a U.S.-funded project, like a costly water treatment plant in Nasiriya, Iraq, that produced murky water and lacked steady electric power and the construction of an Afghan military academy that would cost $40 million to operate and maintain, far beyond what the Afghan government budget could afford.

Around 75% of the total contract dollars spent to support operations in Iraq and Afghanistan has gone to just 23 major contractors, but the federal work force assigned to oversee those contracts hasn't grown in parallel with the massive growth in wartime expenditures.

The report warns that the eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops and assistance poses the risk of "massive new wastes of money," because both the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan may be poorly prepared to manage projects begun with U.S. taxpayer funds.

Clark Irwin, a spokesman for the panel, declined to comment on the report's total preliminary estimate of wasteful spending, saying the commission was "working on a finalizing an estimate of the range."

Mr. Irwin said the commission had publicly discussed a "conservative estimate" that 10%—or around $20 billion—of the total was likely wasted. That doesn't include losses from unsustainable projects that may be abandoned in the future, or fall victim to fraud. Potential losses, he said, "may be significantly higher" than $20 billion.

The U.S. government depends heavily on what it calls "contingency contracting" to support the war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan. Hired hands do everything from cleaning latrines and serving food on military bases to maintaining and operating sophisticated military equipment. The government has also spent heavily on contracted reconstruction projects, building roads, repairing schools and refurbishing power plants.

The report says the U.S. at one point employed more than 209,000 people in Iraq and Afghanistan. That figure outstrips the total number of U.S. troops currently serving in combat: 46,000 in Iraq and 99,000 in Afghanistan.

The Department of Defense, the U.S. agency that has spent the most on battlefield contracting, didn't respond to requests to comment.

Stuart Bowen, the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, said the figures discussed by the commission were in line with his agency's audits of Iraq reconstruction projects.

The 10% estimate of potential waste, he said, was supported by rigorous audits, but estimating losses from poorly sustained projects, he added, was "difficult to measure."

The U.S. government's controversial reliance of private security contractors has been another focus of the commission. The report says the inappropriate use of contract security has at times inadvertently undermined the aims of U.S. foreign policy.

Private security guards have been the most problematic aspect of wartime contracting. In Iraq, a 2007 shooting incident involving security contractor Blackwater (now called Xe Services LLC) sparked a political and diplomatic crisis. Senate investigators last year found evidence that the mostly Afghan force of private security guards the U.S. military depends on to protect convoys and bases in Afghanistan often had ties to criminals, insurgents and local warlords.

The draft report calls for a major overhaul of the way the U.S. employs contractors in wars and crises overseas.

"Delay and inactivity are not good options, for there will be a next contingency, whether the crisis takes the form of overseas hostilities or response to a declared national emergency like a mass-casualty terror attack or natural disaster," the draft says.

Category: US-NATO, Corruption - Views: 6904


Related

29.06.2011: Report: Iraq, Afghanistan Wars Cost US Nearly 4 Trillion USD
06.06.2011: US Spends Two Billion Dollars a Week in Afghanistan
03.06.2011: Report warns billions in U.S. aid may be wasted in Iraq, Afghanistan
29.05.2011: Kabul gold rush: western billions bear fruit in luxury property boom for Afghan capital
22.05.2011: Why US can’t combat Afghan corruption
15.04.2011: Corruption in Afghanistan: The elephant in the room
29.03.2011: Audit of Pentagon Spending Finds 70 Billion USD in Waste
06.03.2011: The 110 Billion USD Question
28.02.2011: Report: Wartime Contractors Waste, Steal Tens Of Billions -- Then Come Back For More
25.02.2011: Study says US wasted billions in Iraq, Afghanistan
19.02.2011: Bringing Home 150 Troops from Afghanistan Would Fix Wisconsin’s Budget “Crisis”
14.02.2011: U.S. contractor with poor ratings hired for more Afghan work
19.01.2011: Corruption Consumes Much Afghan Aid
12.01.2011: U.S. keeps funneling money to troubled Afghan projects
27.12.2010: The US Government Can’t Account For Billions Spent In Afghanistan
23.12.2010: US medicines for Afghan soldiers disappear
20.12.2010: Waste in US Afghan aid seen at billions of dollars
13.12.2010: 52bn USD of American aid and still Afghans are dying of starvation
10.12.2010: Obama/Pentagon Lies to Set the War Narrative and Where Afghan Civilian Deaths Do Matter
09.12.2010: NOT WORTH IT: Every Predator drone in Afghanistan costs taxpayers 4.5 million USD
01.12.2010: NOT WORTH IT: Every Hellfire missile fired in Afghanistan costs USD58,000
01.12.2010: Coalition ramps up air war over Afghanistan, mindful of civilian casualties
30.11.2010: Villagers claim deaths, complicating Afghan push
29.11.2010: Hungry for Some Truth on the Afghanistan War
28.11.2010: Afghanistan: NATO plans to fight despite opposition to war
23.11.2010: Using terrorism as a threat
23.11.2010: Afghanistan injured cost government 500,000 Pound a week
22.11.2010: Pentagon blows up thousands of homes in Afghanistan
20.11.2010: Thousands protest against Afghanistan war
18.11.2010: More Americans oppose war in Afghanistan: poll
16.11.2010: 119.4 Billion USD Investment in the Afghan War This Year
14.11.2010: War on error: that’s what friends are for
10.11.2010: Afghanistan War: Bulldozing through Kandahar
01.11.2010: Afghan civilian deaths caused by allied forces rise
29.10.2010: AFGHANISTAN: More war victims, fewer landmine casualties
28.10.2010: About a billion dollars worth of US aid diverted to Taliban Coffers
25.10.2010: NATO Airstrike Kills 15 in Afghanistan
22.10.2010: BETTER IDEA: Bringing home 243 troops could pay for all higher education for Afghanistan this year
20.10.2010: Bombs in Afghanistan kill more than 20 civilians

Latest

Most Viewed

Comments