News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
RAWA News


 

 

 

Add RAWA RSS Feed to Feedreaders



 




 


RAWA Photo Gallery
From RAWA Photo Gallery
 


Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on Amazon.com

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook


The Huffington Post, March 4, 2011

Afghanistan War Not Worth the Burning of Children and Treasure

I don't doubt for a second that President Obama and much of Washington officialdom think that they take these deaths very seriously

By Derrick Crowe

Fresh from the reported killing of more than 60 civilians, U.S. forces in Kunar Province, Afghanistan, killed nine boys gathering firewood on a mountainside. General Petraeus says he's sorry.

"We are deeply sorry for this tragedy and apologize to the members of the Afghan government, the people of Afghanistan and, most importantly, the surviving family members of those killed by our actions," Gen. Petraeus said in a statement. "These deaths should have never happened."

[utube]krHV9iT20zw&[/utube]

Too little, too late, general. Nine boys now lie among thousands of others who had a right to life independent of U.S. goals in Afghanistan, and "sorry" doesn't cut it, especially from the general who's tripling the air war over Afghanistan. Air strikes are the leading tactic involved when U.S. and coalition forces kill civilians. We know this. We use them anyway. These boys' deaths, or at least the idea of these boys' deaths, were factored in to a calculation and deemed insufficient to deter the use of air power long before they died, and their deaths don't seem to have changed Petraeus' or ISAF's calculus. Sorry doesn't cut it.

But at least Petraeus didn't try to blame the boys' families for blowing them up to frame him this time.

Sorry certainly doesn't cut it for the brother of one of the dead:

"I don't care about the apology," Mohammed Bismil, the 20-year-old brother of two boys killed in the strike, said in a telephone interview. "The only option I have is to pick up a Kalashnikov, RPG [rocket-propelled grenade] or a suicide vest to fight."

President Obama says he's sorry, too:

President Obama expressed his deep regret for the tragic accident in Kunar Province in which nine Afghans were killed. The President conveyed his condolences to the Afghan people and stressed that he and General Petraeus take such incidents very seriously. President Obama and President Karzai agreed that such incidents undermine our shared efforts in fighting terrorism.

Oh, good, he takes such incidents "very seriously." Here's a fun thought experiment: can you imagine President Obama (or any high-ranking visiting U.S. dignitary, for that matter) scheduling a visit to the graveside of any civilian victim of U.S.-fired munitions on his next trip to Afghanistan? Give me a call when the images from that photo-op make the front pages, would you?

I don't doubt for a second that President Obama and much of Washington officialdom think that they take these deaths very seriously. Yet, they continue to rubber-stamp funds and to approve a strategy and various supporting tactics that are guaranteed to cause future incidents like these. Because that's the case, they're conscripting tax money that we send to D.C. every year for the purpose of building our nation together into policies that we don't support and which kill people for whom we feel no malice. In fact, the strategies and tactics are so ill-conceived that they're putting our money into the hands of insurgents who kill U.S. troops.

From Talking Points Memo:

After nearly a decade of mismanagement, theft and fraud, the U.S. military still hasn't found a way to staunch the flow of what is likely hundreds of millions -- if not billions -- of dollars in lost fuel in Afghanistan, some of which is sold on the black market and winds up in Taliban hands, a TPM investigation has found.
...When TPM asked Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA), a longtime member of the defense spending panel, about the fuel losses on Wednesday, Moran was well-versed on the topic, noting that he and other members of the committee had received private briefings by defense officials about the thorny security, logistics and corruption issues posed by the fuel theft.Over the years, the transport of the fuel into the country at times has involved agreements to siphon a portion to outside parties in order to guarantee safe passage of the trucks, Moran said, and some of that fuel has ended up in enemy hands.

This same news story also included mention of a report from last year that showed that U.S. taxpayer funds funneled through protection rackets was one of the insurgents' most significant sources of funding:

...A House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee investigation last year revealed that the companies under the host-nation contract often paid private security contractors to ensure safe passage through Afghanistan. The security contractors, in turn, made protection payment to local warlords in exchange for their agreement to prevent attacks.

Even completed big-ticket completed projects intended to win hearts and minds for the coalition have resulted in new funding streams for insurgents. From Yahoo! News:

By pumping more than $100 million into a hydropower plant, the United States sought to improve the lives of Afghans and win the hearts and minds of tribesmen and farmers who might otherwise turn to the Taliban insurgency. Instead, a prominent outside Pentagon adviser argues, the bungled boondoggle ended up funding the insurgents while doing little to help the United States end the war and bring troops home.

With our money fueling the insurgency and our killing of civilians driving more people to join the Taliban's side every week, it's little wonder that the insurgency continues to grow in size and sophistication. But that brings us back to that calculation, the one that put those nine dead boys in the column titled "Acceptable Losses." With official promises that more troops would lead to more security for ordinary Afghans having collapsed so badly that they read like a bad joke, what could possibly justify this continued bonfire of lives and resources in Afghanistan? The war's not making us safer and it's not worth the cost. Dragging this out until 2014 won't change that one bit.

This week U.S. forces burned children along with the firewood they were gathering. If we allow this brutal, futile war to continue, you can bet that more children and more of our resources will be kindling to a fire that's not keeping anybody warm. The American people want our troops brought home, and it's time President Obama and Congress took that "very seriously."

If you're fed up with this war that's not making us safer and that's not worth the cost, join a Rethink Afghanistan Meetup near you and follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Category: US-NATO, HR Violations, Protest - Views: 6101


Related

03.03.2011: Afghans Protest NATO Air-Strike Deaths
17.02.2011: Fed Up Americans Run First-Ever Anti-Afghanistan-War TV Ad
14.02.2011: The reality of Britain’s War in Afghanistan
10.02.2011: Afghan war killed 2 children daily in 2010: report
09.02.2011: Can the U.S. Make Amends After Blowing Up an Afghan Town?
02.02.2011: 2010: Worst Year for Civilian Deaths of the Afghanistan War
27.01.2011: Afghan ex-detainee tells court of US custody “nightmare”
26.01.2011: Afghanistan’s Situation Gets Worse Because of Foreign Army
25.01.2011: West’s portrayal of Afghan war deceptive: group
24.01.2011: Canada in Afghanistan – The Big Lie machine
22.01.2011: Woman overrun by ISAF vehicle in Herat
20.01.2011: “Eid Gul was just one of 69 Afghan Civilians Killed by US/NATO Forces during December 2010”
18.01.2011: ISAF strike kills 6 of a family in Kunar
30.12.2010: CNN Poll: Opposition to Afghanistan war remains high
10.12.2010: Obama/Pentagon Lies to Set the War Narrative and Where Afghan Civilian Deaths Do Matter
09.12.2010: NOT WORTH IT: Every Predator drone in Afghanistan costs taxpayers 4.5 million USD
06.12.2010: Afghan poll shows falling confidence in U.S. efforts to secure country
01.12.2010: Coalition ramps up air war over Afghanistan, mindful of civilian casualties
30.11.2010: Villagers claim deaths, complicating Afghan push
29.11.2010: Hungry for Some Truth on the Afghanistan War
23.11.2010: Using terrorism as a threat
19.11.2010: The Murderous U.S. Government Explained
18.11.2010: More Americans oppose war in Afghanistan: poll
01.11.2010: Afghan civilian deaths caused by allied forces rise
28.10.2010: The evil side of America
27.10.2010: How British forces fired on Afghan civilians
25.10.2010: NATO Airstrike Kills 15 in Afghanistan
23.10.2010: Afghans say two students killed by NATO troops
22.10.2010: NATO forces put civilians in danger while pounding Taliban strongholds in Afghanistan
16.10.2010: The war on Afghanistan: a crime against humanity
15.10.2010: Afghan War, Afghan Holocaust & Afghan Genocide 9th Anniversary - 4.9 million dead, 3.2 million refugees: report
13.10.2010: Civilian casualties doubled in north: UN
13.10.2010: Afghans say Nato “as bad as the Taliban”
13.10.2010: Afghanistan Air Strikes Up 172 Percent
06.10.2010: Afghan women’s rights leader says Obama no better than Bush
30.09.2010: Most Canadians agree it’s time to leave Afghanistan: Global poll
20.09.2010: Residents happy as UK forces quit Sangin
20.08.2010: 6 in 10 Americans are against the war in Afghanistan, as President Obama sends more troops: poll
23.08.2010: Air base expansions in Afghanistan point to a long future for U.S. forces there
15.08.2010: Probing war crimes in Afghanistan
14.08.2010: NATO Strike Cited in Afghan Civilian Deaths
07.08.2010: Foreign fighters support Taliban in Afghanistan
07.08.2010: The Afghan anti-war movement grows
04.08.2010: Selling the big lie
04.08.2010: President Obama sinks in polls over Afghanistan war policies
28.07.2010: War in Afghanistan: 1 Soldier or 20 Schools?
11.07.2010: “US building secret bases in Afghanistan to attack Russia”
06.07.2010: U.S. Funds Used to Buy Villas for Wealthy Afghans
28.06.2010: Fewer than 100 Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: CIA chief
29.05.2010: We’ve Always Been at War with Eastasia

Latest

Most Viewed

Comments