News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)






Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook

The Huffington Post, February 28, 2011

Report: Wartime Contractors Waste, Steal Tens Of Billions -- Then Come Back For More

A State Department cable obtained by WikiLeaks revealed late last year that Afghanistan's vice president had been caught carrying million in cash

By Dan Froomkin

WASHINGTON -- The chairmen of the bipartisan Commission on Wartime Contracting decried on Monday a federal system that has allowed contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan to commit fraud -- then get hired again and again.

"For the 200,000 people employed by contractors to provide support and capability in Iraq and Afghanistan, accountability is too often absent, diluted, delayed, or avoided," Republican co-chair Chris Shays, formerly a longtime congressman from Connecticut, said while calling to order a hearing of the commission Monday.

Logo of Black & Veatch
McClatchy Newspapers, Feb. 14, 2011: A U.S. contractor who's continued to receive government contracts despite criticism of its work in Afghanistan got low ratings for its performance on two more high-profile projects in the war-torn country than had been disclosed previously. McClatchy Newspapers has learned that the U.S. government criticized Black & Veatch for poor oversight and delays on a Kabul power plant project and for a study of the viability of developing a natural gas field in the Sheberghan region in northern Afghanistan. (Photo: 12d Solutions Pty Ltd)

There are so many barriers to suspending or banning contractors with violations that "untrustworthy contractors can continue profiting from government work, responsible businesses may be denied opportunities, and costs to taxpayers can climb," Shays said in a statement co-authored with his Democratic co-chair, Michael Thibault, formerly the deputy director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

The commission last week issued a blistering interim report to Congress: "At What Risk? Correcting over-reliance on contractors in contingency operations," which concluded that "misspent dollars run into the tens of billions" out of the nearly $200 billion spent on contracts and grants since 2002 to support military, reconstruction and other U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And that could well be an understatement, the commission noted, because "it might not take full account of ill-conceived projects, poor planning and oversight by the U.S. government, and criminal behavior and blatant corruption by both government and contractor employees."

The report suggested that the government stop using contractors so routinely, start taking oversight more seriously and establish strong interagency standards.

It called for an end to contractors' current role in hiring other contractors, concluding that they tend not to erect the appropriate oversight firewalls.

And most controversially, the report said the extensive use of private security contractors -- which has surged under President Barack Obama -- raises use-of-force issues and creates a gap in legal accountability

So rather than let them run wild, the commission recommended that agencies relying on private security contractors be required to embed government personnel among them who would be "responsible for leadership, command and control, and oversight of all security contractors and operations."

(The commission also promised that its final report, due this summer, will further address the over-reliance on private contractors to provide "movement security" for government workers in war zones. That's a shot across the bow of the State Department.)

The commission's findings, however, are just the latest in a litany of official and journalistic reports about the enormous cost of waste, fraud and corruption in Iraq and, particularly, Afghanistan.

Just last month, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction warned that the entire $11.4 billion for constructing and maintaining nearly 900 Afghan National Security Forces facilities is at risk due to inadequate planning.

The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction said in 2009 that an estimated $3 billion to $5 billion in U.S.-funded infrastructure contracting had been wasted there.

McClatchy Newspapers have exposed example after example of waste and abuse in contracts for Afghan reconstruction.

A State Department cable obtained by WikiLeaks revealed late last year that Afghanistan's vice president had been caught carrying $52 million in cash in a Persian Gulf tax haven.

(See 10 more examples.)

In his remarks at Monday's hearing, Scott Amey, general counsel for the nonprofit watchdog group Project on Government Oversight (POGO), testified that "contract award dollars have increased from approximately $200 billion in fiscal year 2000 to over $535 billion in fiscal year 2010." Meanwhile, however, "contract administration and oversight have decreased because the acquisition workforce is stretched thin," he said.

Since 2002, POGO has maintained a Federal Contract Misconduct Database, which served as the model for the government-created Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), due to become publicly available starting in April.

Witnesses at Monday's hearing said, however, that the federal database doesn't adequately record contractors' past performance.

As it happens, the Obama administration recently caved to pressure from contractors and won't be making that past performance data available publicly.

But even internally, witnesses said, the state of the data is abysmal. Of the 1,485 past performance reports required from the Department of Defense, only 140 had been entered into the database. Of the 174 required from the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development, not a single one could actually be found, although USAID insisted 24 had been entered.

And Dan Gordon, President Obama's administrator for federal procurement policy, said three-quarters of the performance reports that were filed still lacked required documentation.

But judging from POGO's database, Amey testified:

Some of the largest service contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan have checkered histories of misconduct, including instances of shooting civilians, false claims against the government, violations of the Anti-Kickback Act, fraud, retaliation against workers' complaints, and environmental violations.

Amey also raised an all-too-familiar concern, though from another context:

The government's inability to hold all contractors accountable begs the question: Is the government so reliant on large contractors that bad actors are required to preserving legitimate competition and mission accomplishment? This might be the contracting version of "too big to fail."

Dan Froomkin is senior Washington correspondent for the Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail, bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed, follow him on Twitter, friend him on Facebook, and/or become a fan and get e-mail alerts when he writes.

Category: US-NATO, Corruption - Views: 10746


25.02.2011: Study says US wasted billions in Iraq, Afghanistan
19.02.2011: Bringing Home 150 Troops from Afghanistan Would Fix Wisconsin’s Budget “Crisis”
14.02.2011: U.S. contractor with poor ratings hired for more Afghan work
19.01.2011: Corruption Consumes Much Afghan Aid
12.01.2011: U.S. keeps funneling money to troubled Afghan projects
27.12.2010: The US Government Can’t Account For Billions Spent In Afghanistan
23.12.2010: US medicines for Afghan soldiers disappear
20.12.2010: Waste in US Afghan aid seen at billions of dollars
13.12.2010: 52bn USD of American aid and still Afghans are dying of starvation
10.12.2010: Obama/Pentagon Lies to Set the War Narrative and Where Afghan Civilian Deaths Do Matter
09.12.2010: NOT WORTH IT: Every Predator drone in Afghanistan costs taxpayers 4.5 million USD
01.12.2010: NOT WORTH IT: Every Hellfire missile fired in Afghanistan costs USD58,000
01.12.2010: Coalition ramps up air war over Afghanistan, mindful of civilian casualties
30.11.2010: Villagers claim deaths, complicating Afghan push
29.11.2010: Hungry for Some Truth on the Afghanistan War
28.11.2010: Afghanistan: NATO plans to fight despite opposition to war
23.11.2010: Using terrorism as a threat
23.11.2010: Afghanistan injured cost government 500,000 Pound a week
22.11.2010: Pentagon blows up thousands of homes in Afghanistan
20.11.2010: Thousands protest against Afghanistan war
18.11.2010: More Americans oppose war in Afghanistan: poll
16.11.2010: 119.4 Billion USD Investment in the Afghan War This Year
14.11.2010: War on error: that’s what friends are for
10.11.2010: Afghanistan War: Bulldozing through Kandahar
01.11.2010: Afghan civilian deaths caused by allied forces rise
29.10.2010: AFGHANISTAN: More war victims, fewer landmine casualties
28.10.2010: About a billion dollars worth of US aid diverted to Taliban Coffers
25.10.2010: NATO Airstrike Kills 15 in Afghanistan
22.10.2010: BETTER IDEA: Bringing home 243 troops could pay for all higher education for Afghanistan this year
20.10.2010: Bombs in Afghanistan kill more than 20 civilians
29.10.2009: Calculating The Cost Of The War In Afghanistan
30.09.2009: The So-Called “Good War” in Afghanistan is Now “The High Cost War”
24.10.2007: Iraq and Afghanistan wars may total USD2.4 trillion
24.10.2007: Trillion-dollar war: Afghanistan and Iraq set to cost more than Vietnam and Korea


Most Viewed