News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
RAWA News


 

 

 

Add RAWA RSS Feed to Feedreaders



 




 


RAWA Photo Gallery
From RAWA Photo Gallery
 


Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on Amazon.com

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook


New Statesman, February 14, 2011

The reality of Britain’s War in Afghanistan

With the war in Afghanistan entering its tenth year, a report by War on Want exposes the truth behind the conflict

By Yasmin Khan

As the US-led occupation of Afghanistan enters its tenth year, casualties have risen among Afghan civilians and NATO forces alike, making the last 12 months the bloodiest of the conflict to date. US and British forces are engaged in a dirty war in Afghanistan, using aerial bombing, drone attacks, torture prisons and corporate mercenaries against the Afghan people, all of which are fuelling further insecurity and fostering human rights abuse.

Protestors hold placards that read Afghanistan during a demonstration while the 47th Conference on Security Policy takes place in Munich
Protestors hold placards that read Afghanistan during a demonstration while the 47th Conference on Security Policy takes place in Munich February 5, 2011. (Photo: Reuters)

Afghanistan has become one of the most militarised countries on earth, with the security sector far and away the largest single element of national expenditure. Recent years have seen UK suppliers export arms worth £32.5 million to Afghanistan. Alongside the US and British military in Afghanistan is a 'shadow army' of private military and security companies (PMSCs) Between 2007 and 2009, the UK government spent £62.8 million on these private military and security companies in Afghanistan.

Afghanistan has borne the brunt of decades of foreign intervention and conflict, and as a result is one of the poorest countries in the world. Life expectancy is 44.6 years, one of the lowest in the world. Yet development policy is being used to pursue military goals and to privatise the country's economy, while multinational companies profit at the expense of one of the least developed countries. Of the $38.6 billion given in US aid to Afghanistan between 2002 and 2009, 56 per cent was spent on 'security', primarily building up the army and police.

The future of Afghanistan is being determined by the self-interest of the USA, UK and other occupying powers. In July 2009 the then Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth stated: "The entire region in which Afghanistan sits is of vital strategic importance to the United Kingdom. British interests in the region are closely aligned with those of the USA The USA considers Afghanistan of critical geopolitical importance for its long term interests in Central and South Asia, as well as for the country's significance as a neighbour of Iran. In addition to its other strategic interests, the USA has long promoted a natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan. in December 2010. US Assistant Secretary of State, Richard Boucher, confirmed in 2007 that "one of our goals is to stabilise Afghanistan... so that energy can flow to the south".

As it becomes increasingly clear that the US and UK military presence is a central part of the problem in Afghanistan, not the solution we need a new debate on the occupation of Afghanistan. Over 70 per cent of British people favour a withdrawal of British troops either soon or immediately. Yet all three major UK political parties are committed to continuing the military offensive and keeping British forces in Afghanistan until 2015 and maintaining a strategic presence for an undetermined time thereafter. It is time for the immediate withdrawal of British troops from Afghanistan, and a negotiated settlement which guarantees self-determination, security and human rights for the Afghan people. We owe it to the Afghan people to stand up for their rights and to end the occupation of their country, so that the process of reconstruction can at last begin.

Yasmin Khan is Senior Campaigns Officer for War on Want.

Category: US-NATO, HR Violations, Protest - Views: 8463


Related

10.02.2011: Afghan war killed 2 children daily in 2010: report
09.02.2011: Can the U.S. Make Amends After Blowing Up an Afghan Town?
02.02.2011: 2010: Worst Year for Civilian Deaths of the Afghanistan War
27.01.2011: Afghan ex-detainee tells court of US custody “nightmare”
26.01.2011: Afghanistan’s Situation Gets Worse Because of Foreign Army
25.01.2011: West’s portrayal of Afghan war deceptive: group
24.01.2011: Canada in Afghanistan – The Big Lie machine
22.01.2011: Woman overrun by ISAF vehicle in Herat
20.01.2011: “Eid Gul was just one of 69 Afghan Civilians Killed by US/NATO Forces during December 2010”
18.01.2011: ISAF strike kills 6 of a family in Kunar
30.12.2010: CNN Poll: Opposition to Afghanistan war remains high
10.12.2010: Obama/Pentagon Lies to Set the War Narrative and Where Afghan Civilian Deaths Do Matter
09.12.2010: NOT WORTH IT: Every Predator drone in Afghanistan costs taxpayers 4.5 million USD
06.12.2010: Afghan poll shows falling confidence in U.S. efforts to secure country
01.12.2010: Coalition ramps up air war over Afghanistan, mindful of civilian casualties
30.11.2010: Villagers claim deaths, complicating Afghan push
29.11.2010: Hungry for Some Truth on the Afghanistan War
23.11.2010: Using terrorism as a threat
19.11.2010: The Murderous U.S. Government Explained
18.11.2010: More Americans oppose war in Afghanistan: poll
01.11.2010: Afghan civilian deaths caused by allied forces rise
28.10.2010: The evil side of America
27.10.2010: How British forces fired on Afghan civilians
25.10.2010: NATO Airstrike Kills 15 in Afghanistan
23.10.2010: Afghans say two students killed by NATO troops
22.10.2010: NATO forces put civilians in danger while pounding Taliban strongholds in Afghanistan
16.10.2010: The war on Afghanistan: a crime against humanity
15.10.2010: Afghan War, Afghan Holocaust & Afghan Genocide 9th Anniversary - 4.9 million dead, 3.2 million refugees: report
13.10.2010: Civilian casualties doubled in north: UN
13.10.2010: Afghans say Nato “as bad as the Taliban”
13.10.2010: Afghanistan Air Strikes Up 172 Percent
06.10.2010: Afghan women’s rights leader says Obama no better than Bush
30.09.2010: Most Canadians agree it’s time to leave Afghanistan: Global poll
20.09.2010: Residents happy as UK forces quit Sangin
20.08.2010: 6 in 10 Americans are against the war in Afghanistan, as President Obama sends more troops: poll
23.08.2010: Air base expansions in Afghanistan point to a long future for U.S. forces there
15.08.2010: Probing war crimes in Afghanistan
14.08.2010: NATO Strike Cited in Afghan Civilian Deaths
07.08.2010: Foreign fighters support Taliban in Afghanistan
07.08.2010: The Afghan anti-war movement grows
04.08.2010: Selling the big lie
04.08.2010: President Obama sinks in polls over Afghanistan war policies
28.07.2010: War in Afghanistan: 1 Soldier or 20 Schools?
11.07.2010: “US building secret bases in Afghanistan to attack Russia”
06.07.2010: U.S. Funds Used to Buy Villas for Wealthy Afghans
28.06.2010: Fewer than 100 Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: CIA chief
29.05.2010: We’ve Always Been at War with Eastasia

Latest

Most Viewed

Comments