News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
RAWA News


 

 

 

Add RAWA RSS Feed to Feedreaders



 




 


RAWA Photo Gallery
From RAWA Photo Gallery
 


Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on Amazon.com

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook


The Register Guard, November 16, 2010

119.4 Billion USD Investment in the Afghan War This Year

The United States accounts for 46.5 percent of the combined defense spending of all the nations of the world, according to a widely accepted recent estimate

I come not to bury the manifesto issued last week by President Obama’s debt-reduction commission, but to praise the most welcome of its ideas: Slash defense spending along with everything else.

The panel’s co-chairmen, Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, identify $100 billion in defense cuts that could be made in 2015. That would be too little and too late, but what’s almost revolutionary is the notion that if we’re ever to get this nation back on sound economic footing, we have to cut what Dwight Eisenhower called the “military-industrial complex” down to size.

The United States accounts for 46.5 percent of the combined defense spending of all the nations of the world, according to a widely accepted recent estimate. The next-biggest spender is China, which has undertaken an immense build-up to become a military as well as economic superpower — yet accounts for just 6.6 percent of the world’s total.

And while the debt-ridden U.S. government shells out for nearly half of all global defense expenditures, our most loyal, stalwart, shoulder-to-shoulder allies — Britain and France — pitch in just 3.8 percent and 4.2 percent, respectively, of the world total. Somebody’s getting a free ride, and we’re getting stuck with the bill.

According to a report prepared in September by the Congressional Research Service, the two wars have already cost $1.1 trillion. That figure doesn’t include an estimated $170 billion for the current fiscal year — and there’s no real end in sight.
As Obama promised, we are withdrawing from Iraq; the cost of George W. Bush’s epic misadventure has fallen to “only” an estimated $51 billion in 2011. By contrast, the price tag for Obama’s expanded war in Afghanistan has nearly doubled since Bush’s last year in office.
The Register Guard, Nov. 16, 2010

Bowles and Simpson properly classify defense spending as discretionary, meaning we are able to make choices. This should be axiomatic. But it has been Republican Party orthodoxy to inveigh against “big government” and its out-of-control spending while blithely ignoring the nearly $700 billion we’re lavishing annually on the Pentagon, as if every penny were somehow preordained and inviolate.

This may become a point of contention as the unorthodox Republicans elected in the GOP wave come surfing into town. Wariness of “foreign entanglements,” to use George Washington’s phrase, is a prominent strain of tea party thought. The Republicans will have to deal with calls to cut Pentagon spending from their side of the aisle.

The debt panel chairmen’s proposed defense cuts, meant to be “illustrative,” include civilian and noncombat pay freezes, a 15 percent cut in procurement, shrinking or eliminating some foreign bases, and $28 billion in “overhead” savings that Defense Secretary Robert Gates has already pledged. But Bowles and Simpson don’t state the obvious, which is that a much more effective way to cut defense costs would be to bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan.

According to a report prepared in September by the Congressional Research Service, the two wars have already cost $1.1 trillion. That figure doesn’t include an estimated $170 billion for the current fiscal year — and there’s no real end in sight.

As Obama promised, we are withdrawing from Iraq; the cost of George W. Bush’s epic misadventure has fallen to “only” an estimated $51 billion in 2011. By contrast, the price tag for Obama’s expanded war in Afghanistan has nearly doubled since Bush’s last year in office.

It should be noted that Bush never bothered to put the Iraq and Afghanistan costs into his budgets. Obama at least accounts for these expenditures transparently instead of pretending that money spent for war somehow doesn’t count.

Overall, the federal budget is expected to run a $1 trillion deficit this year. In effect, we’re borrowing money from China and using some of it to keep a measure of order in Afghanistan. This is allowing the Chinese to sign contracts and build infrastructure that will let them exploit Afghanistan’s vast mineral wealth — while we pay the borrowed money back with interest.

And what kind of return are we getting on our $119.4 billion investment in Afghanistan this year? Our enemy, the Taliban, remains powerful and entrenched. Under Gen. David Petraeus, our forces are trying to pursue a counterinsurgency strategy. But one prerequisite — a trustworthy local government that deserves and wins popular support — does not exist. The administration of President Hamid Karzai is seen as riddled with corruption, and Karzai himself can be as inconstant as a zephyr.

In an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday, Karzai demanded that a key element of Petraeus’ plan — nighttime “capture-and-kill” raids by Special Operations forces — be halted because they generate such anger among civilians.

“The time has come to reduce military operations. The time has come to reduce the presence of, you know, boots in Afghanistan ... to reduce the intrusiveness into the daily Afghan life,” Karzai told the Post.

All right, then, let’s save American lives and a ton of money. Let’s oblige him.

Eugene Robinson (eugenerobinson@washpost.com) is a columnist for The Washington Post.

Category: US-NATO - Views: 4359


Related

14.11.2010: War on error: that’s what friends are for
12.11.2010: Harper’s flip-flop on Afghanistan
22.10.2010: BETTER IDEA: Bringing home 243 troops could pay for all higher education for Afghanistan this year
16.10.2010: The war on Afghanistan: a crime against humanity
08.10.2010: Security contractors in Afghanistan “fund Taliban”
30.09.2010: Taxpayer money funneled to Taliban
28.07.2010: War in Afghanistan: 1 Soldier or 20 Schools?
10.06.2010: US Military Campaigns In Iraq And Afghanistan Cost More Than USD1 Trillion: Report
13.01.2010: Obama to ask for USD33 billion for Afghan troop buildup
09.01.2010: Afghanistan mission price tag passes 525,000 Dollar per soldier
31.12.2009: John Pilger: Welcome to Orwell’s World 2010
30.12.2009: Poll: Canadians say the war in Afghanistan is unwinnable
28.12.2009: U.S. troops’ death toll in Afghanistan doubles in 2009
26.12.2009: The US army is overstretched and exhausted, says peace campaigner Sarah Lazare
22.12.2009: Ex-US diplomat predicts Afghan troop surge failure
12.12.2009: Obama’s War Speech: The Questions It Raises… And The Answer That Must Be Given
04.12.2009: Obama’s plan for Afghanistan, a carbon-copy of George Bush’s
03.12.2009: President Obama’s Secret: Only 100 Al Qaeda Now in Afghanistan
30.11.2009: A troop surge can only magnify the crime against Afghanistan
30.11.2009: Obama’s star falls from the heavens
13.11.2009: How the US army protects its trucks – by paying the Taliban
04.11.2009: Obama’s Prize tells world ‘War is Peace’
15.10.2009: Killing the Innocents to Save ‘Our Troops’
30.09.2009: The So-Called “Good War” in Afghanistan is Now “The High Cost War”
29.10.2009: Calculating The Cost Of The War In Afghanistan
24.10.2007: Iraq and Afghanistan wars may total USD2.4 trillion
24.10.2007: Trillion-dollar war: Afghanistan and Iraq set to cost more than Vietnam and Korea

Latest

Most Viewed

Comments