News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
RAWA News


 

 

 

Add RAWA RSS Feed to Feedreaders



 




 


RAWA Photo Gallery
From RAWA Photo Gallery
 


Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on Amazon.com

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook


Le Monde diplomatique, October 4, 2010

Afghanistan nine years on

the same militia commanders financed and supported by Washington in 2001 were already systematic human rights abusers whose actions had helped inspire the original formation of the Taliban movement

On 7 October 2001, the US-led invasion of Afghanistan began. Barely a month later, Kabul fell to the Northern Alliance. It was, it seemed to observers at the time, a short and relatively painless conflict. A new type of war that relied on using proxy local militia commanders and the power of the American air force appeared to have been fought with ease. No sooner had the world been made to take notice of the Taliban than they were defeated.

karzai_fahim_khalili2.jpg
President Karzai takes the oath of office alongside Mohammad Qasim Fahim, left, and Karim Khalili, right, his vice-presidents. Both are well-known brutal warlords who made Kabul a bloodbath in the 1992-1996 civil war. (Photo: Paula Bronstein/Getty Images)

Today, that first autumn after 9/11 has long faded into memory for the people of Afghanistan. At best, it conjures up the same kind of sad emotions as an old photograph. At worst, it feels like a sham: a bitter prologue to yet another story of occupation and bloodshed. Much of what has happened since can be traced to that early period, when the war was painted just in black and white. Even then, victory was not certain and the boundaries between right and wrong, good and evil, were never clear-cut.

The questions being raised about the conflict now could, and should, have been asked at the very start. The seeds of the Taliban’s resurgence and the corruption of the Karzai administration were planted immediately, when many of the US troops who later died here were only children.

Relying on the Northern Alliance certainly meant that few US citizens were initially put in harm’s way in a country known for its hatred of foreign invaders. But it also demonstrated a profound or wilful ignorance of another aspect of Afghan history: the same militia commanders financed and supported by Washington in 2001 were already systematic human rights abusers whose actions had helped inspire the original formation of the Taliban movement.

From 1992-96, their fighters razed Kabul to the ground, killing tens of thousands of civilians. Under their leadership, homes were looted, women raped and men kidnapped and tortured. Abdul Rashid Dostum, a key Northern Alliance figure for the Americans, was among them. An ethnic Uzbek, he is also accused of massacring prisoners of war while working for the US during the invasion — something Pashtuns still mention when asked why they oppose the occupation. He has a ceremonial position in the Karzai government.

Mohammad Qasim Fahim, who swept his forces into Kabul in 2001, is well known for his hand in the chaos of the 1990s. He is now first vice-president.Other prominent figures in modern Afghan politics played a central role in the carnage and sectarian divisions of recent history. A number of them ran in September’s parliamentary election, which has become mired in allegations of widespread fraud.

When members of a High Peace Council set up to facilitate negotiations with the insurgents were named last week, they included individuals despised by the Taliban and their sympathisers, making a mockery of any claim that it can orchestrate a serious breakthrough. On the list was Burhanuddin Rabbani, president from 1992-96, Abdul Rab Rasul Sayyaf, a notorious former mujahid, and Haji Mohammed Mohaqiq, a Shia leader whose party has been accused of human rights atrocities. All have been clients, in one form or another, of the US.

Rather than usher in a new beginning, the 2001 invasion resurrected the ghosts of the past and laid the groundwork for what may yet be a brutal civil war in the years ahead.

The first captives started arriving at Guantanamo Bay from Afghanistan in January 2002. Others were held without charge or trial in the detention centre at Bagram air base, north of Kabul. The Taliban could not have wished for a better propaganda tool to fuel their recruitment drive and set the insurgency in motion. Despite some cosmetic changes, the US still keeps prisoners at both facilities in conditions that anger and disgust Afghans. Too often, people also continue to be rounded up or killed by American and Nato troops on the basis of faulty intelligence information — a pattern that is as old as the war.

Pessimists foresaw today’s scenario in the build-up to the invasion. After it, even those who were cautiously optimistic should have had doubts. By 2005 it was obvious to anyone watching closely that the situation was deteriorating fast.

The Taliban were never defeated. Instead, they melted away and bided their time, as all successful guerrilla movements do. Their return, through force or a political deal, seems inevitable. Whether thousands of lives could have been saved by genuinely trying to negotiate with them nine yeas ago is just one of the questions it is too late to ask.

Improvements to some aspects of Afghan society that were ushered in by the invasion came at considerable cost, to the country, its foreign allies and the region. In the case of women’s rights, they are also grossly exaggerated.

This war has lasted longer than America’s overt military campaign in Vietnam and coincided with a period of domestic economic meltdown in the US. Al-Qaida and the Taliban have spread into Pakistan, a nuclear state which is more volatile than ever before. Meanwhile, Afghanistan is experiencing some of the most frightening insecurity it has known. A new generation of young men have been radicalised and learned to hate western-style democracy just as their fathers hated communism. The rebels are increasingly picking up support in northern provinces, away from their heartlands in the south and east.

People here fear the situation will get even worse. Unlike in 2001, there is no real hope anymore — just varying degrees of anger and anxiety. Nine years on, Afghans are scared — of the Taliban, of the warlords, of the foreign troops, of their government, and of the future.

Category: Warlords, Taliban/ISIS/Terrorism, US-NATO - Views: 6177


Related

24.09.2010: Warlord TV
23.08.2010: Afghanistan: Land of Injustice and Warlords
23.08.2010: Afghanistan’s new war crimes museum punts on still-powerful warlords
12.08.2010: The real story behind Time’s Afghan woman cover: American complicity
14.06.2010: Danger Looms if Afghan Vice President & Warlord becomes Country’s President
14.05.2010: Victims of Afghan wars demand justice before peace
18.04.2010: “In My Father’s House They Gathered All the Women into One Room”
26.03.2010: The Bloody Hands of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar
25.03.2010: Afghan amnesty for militants draws UN condemnation
05.03.2010: ‘Afghan women lawmakers hamstrung by warlords’
27.02.2010: Afghanistan worlords’ unwelcome return
18.02.2010: Two Afghan women are publicly flogged by local warlord in Ghor
11.02.2010: Afghanistan quietly brings into force Taliban amnesty law
27.01.2010: In Afghanistan: Embracing Gulbuddin Hekmatyar Is No Method at All
17.01.2010: Dealing with brutal Afghan warlords is a mistake
17.12.2009: Warlords Re-emerging in North
14.12.2009: Canada ‘defended’ torturer
31.10.2009: NATO forces turn to warlords
10.07.2009: U.S. Said to Have Averted Inquiry Into ’01 Afghan Killings
06.06.2009: The U.S. and the Afghan Tragedy
10.05.2009: Karzai in move to share power with Hekmatyar, warlord wanted by US
04.05.2009: Karzai ignored UN pleas, named notorious warlord as vice president
27.02.2009: Western officials, Taliban engaged in secret talks
01.01.2009: A Day Afghans Will Always Remember
16.12.2008: From the CIA to the ISI to the Lashkar-e-Taiba: Mumbai Terror’s Afghan Roots
12.12.2008: As possible Afghan war-crimes evidence removed, US silent
11.07.2008: Afghan Warlords, Formerly Backed By the CIA, Now Turn Their Guns On U.S. Troops
03.06.2008: Connection of Some Afghan Authorities with Armed Groups
30.05.2008: Gulbuddin Hekmatyar’s spokesman and son-in-law freed in Kabul
16.04.2008: Afghan parliament committee drafts Taliban-style moral law
11.03.2008: Warlord under siege after 'kidnap and torture' of former ally
19.02.2008: Feared Afghan strongman suspended from government post
08.02.2008: Waiting for justice
06.02.2008: Northern Warlord Flexes His Muscles
03.02.2008: Former Warlord in Standoff With Police at Kabul Home
10.01.2008: America's great game: The 2001 invasion was planned before 9/11
23.11.2007: Ex-commanders warn of dire consequences if ignored
19.11.2007: 1.1 Million Dollar Contact of Canadian Military with a Company of Infamous Warlord
19.11.2007: Afghan boy dancers sexually abused by former warlords
08.11.2007: Warlords no better than Taliban, says Afghan MP
03.11.2007: Afghan criminals and warlords
28.10.2007: Afghan Ex-Militia Leaders Hoard Illegal Arms
26.10.2007: Yunus Qanooni: Friend or Foe of Democracy in Afghanistan?
18.10.2007: Strongman's Reign of Fear in the Northern Afghanistan
13.09.2007: For residents of the northern province of Takhar, there are worse things than the Taliban
29.04.2007: Afghan amnesty shows warlord's clout
16.03.2007: From frying pan to the fire
27.02.2007: 2,000 illegal armed groups active in northern Afghanistan
20.02.2007: The Upper House of Parliament Approve Amnesty For War Criminals
02.02.2007: UN opposes Afghanistan bill giving immunity to war criminals
01.02.2007: Afghan assembly grants immunity for war crimes
08.01.2007: Dostum accused for insecurity in Jawzjan, Faryab
05.05.2006: US not interested in peace in Afghanistan: Kathy Gannon
06.04.2006: Hezb-e-Islami of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar has 34 members in the lower house of parliament

Latest

Most Viewed

Comments