<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-2" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>


<title>RAWA News</title>
<link>https://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/rawanews.php</link>
<description>News Archive of the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)</description>



<language>En</language>
<generator>RAWANews 2.5.4</generator>

<title><![CDATA[How can this bloody failure be regarded as a good war?]]></title>
<link>https://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2007/08/23/how-can-this-bloody-failure-be-regarded-as-a-good-war.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The Guardian: The Guardian: Enthusiasts for the catastrophe that is the Iraq war may be hard to come by these days, but Afghanistan is another matter. The invasion and occupation that opened George Bush's war on terror are still championed by powerful voices in the occupying states as - in the words of the New York Times this week - "the good war" that can still be won. While speculation intensifies about British withdrawal from Basra, there's no such talk about a retreat from Kabul or Kandahar. On the contrary, the plan is to increase British troop numbers from the current 7,000, and ministers, commanders and officials have been hammering home the message all summer that Britain is in Afghanistan, as the foreign secretary, David Miliband, insisted, for the long haul.]]></description>
</channel>
</rss>