News from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
RAWA News


 

 

 

Add RAWA RSS Feed to Feedreaders



 




 


RAWA Photo Gallery
From RAWA Photo Gallery
 


Help RAWA: Order from our wish list on Amazon.com

RAWA Channel on Youtube

Follow RAWA on Twitter

Join RAWA on Facebook


The Washington Post, December 21, 2010

The costs of war

By 2014, this administration will have spent more than 0 billion on Afghanistan directly

By Katrina vande Heuvel

"We are winning" in Afghanistan, says Gen. David H. Petraeus. President Obama declares that the December military review shows we are "on track." No doubt the president and the general are right: We will keep "making progress" for as many months or years as we choose to fight what is now America's longest war - until we finally pull out, in defeat or in political exhaustion, wondering what we have accomplished for all the blood and treasure spent.

The president's review only confirmed what informed observers already know. U.S. troops can win nearly any firefight. But ultimately we are no more secure, and Afghanistan is no closer to becoming a stable and developing country. No matter how light or agile their "footprint," U.S. and allied occupying forces end up generating as many enemies as they kill, not only in Afghanistan but in other Muslim lands. No matter how much help we give to the Afghan people, inevitably it is seen as being on behalf of a government that is more a kleptocracy than a democracy.

How does one measure progress in what should be more accurately described as a counterproductive and now unnecessary war? We're chasing a diminished band of al- Qaeda terrorists who now pose little threat to us in the forbidding terrain of North Waziristan and Baluchistan on the Pakistani border, while our Pakistani allies cynically buy into both sides of the fight.

The United States accounts for 46.5 percent of the combined defense spending of all the nations of the world, according to a widely accepted recent estimate. The next-biggest spender is China, which has undertaken an immense build-up to become a military as well as economic superpower — yet accounts for just 6.6 percent of the world’s total.
...
According to a report prepared in September by the Congressional Research Service, the two wars have already cost $1.1 trillion. That figure doesn’t include an estimated $170 billion for the current fiscal year — and there’s no real end in sight.
The Register Guard, Nov. 16, 2010

We're spending $100 billion a year on a country that had a gross domestic product of a little more than $2 billion when we invaded in 2001. We manage this feat only by helping to fund both sides of the conflict (much of the aid ends up in the hands of the Taliban as well as regional warlords who don't support the Karzai government). The military focus displaces attention that should be devoted to regional diplomacy and a political settlement within Afghanistan. Instead we are "making progress," even as the review quietly shifts our departure date from 2011 to 2014.

Missing in the president's review are the actual costs of the war. That includes what economists call "opportunity costs," or what we miss by continuing this course. By 2014, this administration will have spent more than $700 billion on Afghanistan directly. Poverty is an unfashionable word in Washington, but it afflicts a record 43 million Americans. Childhood poverty is rising. Nationally, only one in seven black male teens held any type of job in the first quarter of this year. We should not fool ourselves: A generation of children raised on dangerous streets is being condemned to a life of misery - hunger, broken families, unemployment, drugs and crime. The nation we are failing to build in Afghanistan is our own.

If poverty is too liberal a concern, consider the costs of Afghanistan to our economic competitiveness. America is literally falling apart. Our aged and decrepit infrastructure is becoming a clear and present danger. Lives are lost when a bridge falls in Minneapolis or the levees collapse in New Orleans. SUVs are swallowed by collapsing sewage systems in New York. Children go to schools judged dangerous to their health. Hours are lost when aged train switches freeze, sewer systems collapse or traffic snarls. Even the basics of civilization, such as access to clean water, are increasingly at risk because of aging and leaky sewage systems. Our electric grid, our broadband system and our transportation system all lag behind those of global competitors. Combine the $700 billion spent in Afghanistan and the $700 billion to be squandered on tax breaks for the richest 1 percent of Americans over the next decade, and you have real money, even for Washington. Money that this increasingly challenged country can no longer afford to waste.

Notably absent in the commentary about the president's review, too, are the war's human costs. The service of those in our volunteer army is routinely praised on all sides. The Democratic Congress under President George W. Bush and Obama committed itself to improving military pay, educational benefits and medical and psychological care. But celebrating servicemembers' courage ignores the basic question: How do you ask young men and women to give their life or limbs for a cause that you know is lost? Or worse, has no justifiable purpose?

The December military review has resulted in a predictable political straddle. The president fulfills his pledge that some troops will come home in 2011; General Petraeus gets a commitment for another four years of occupation before the Afghan government might "assume responsibility." In the 2012 presidential race, the withdrawals can be advertised to unhappy doves, while the continuing commitment can be used to appease the appetite of hawks.

Afghanistan now awaits its Fulbright. It is time for the Senate to make an independent review of the war, and to challenge - as Sen. J.William Fulbright did during the Vietnam war - a president unwilling to end a conflict he knows will not be won. Surely, it is fate that the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is Sen. John Kerry. Nearly 40 years ago, as a brave, decorated, young Navy lieutenant returning from Vietnam, he challenged senators to do their duty, saying that each day "someone has to give up his life so that the United States doesn't have to admit something that the entire world already knows . . . that we have made a mistake. . . . How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?"

Does Sen. Kerry, now steeped in Washington's political culture, have the same courage as that young man? Will he stand up, as Fulbright did before him, to challenge a president of his own party in the nation's best interest? A new generation of young men and women depends on him to lead.

Katrina vanden Heuvel is editor and publisher of the Nation and writes a weekly online column for The Post.

Category: US-NATO, HR Violations - Views: 3583


Related

21.12.2010: Kandahar gains came with “brutal” tactics
20.12.2010: Waste in US Afghan aid seen at billions of dollars
19.12.2010: Contractors Behaving Badly A US Headache
18.12.2010: Patrick Cockburn: History is repeating itself in Afghanistan
18.12.2010: Why Night Raids May Doom U.S. Prospects in Afghanistan
16.12.2010: NATO air strike kills 4 Afghan soldiers: ministry
16.12.2010: Security contractor: Afghan police running amok
16.12.2010: Illiteracy Breeds Corruption, Slows Training Among Afghan Recruits
16.12.2010: Roadside bomb kills 14 civilians in Afghan west
15.12.2010: The Afghan money pit
15.12.2010: AFGHANISTAN: Humanitarian situation likely to worsen in 2011 - aid agencies
13.12.2010: Afghanistan Corrupted by U.S. and 30 Years of Foreign Meddling
13.12.2010: 52bn USD of American aid and still Afghans are dying of starvation
12.12.2010: Jailed Afghan Drug Lord Was Informer on U.S. Payroll
11.12.2010: AFGHANISTAN: Risking all for the chance of a better life
10.12.2010: Obama/Pentagon Lies to Set the War Narrative and Where Afghan Civilian Deaths Do Matter
10.12.2010: Hundreds demand justice in war-blighted Afghanistan
09.12.2010: NOT WORTH IT: Every Predator drone in Afghanistan costs taxpayers 4.5 million USD
08.12.2010: WikiLeaks Accuses US Company of Bad Conduct in Afghanistan
06.12.2010: Afghan poll shows falling confidence in U.S. efforts to secure country
04.12.2010: UN: 7.4 million Afghans are living with hunger and fear of starvation
02.12.2010: Foreign contractors hired Afghan “dancing boys”, WikiLeaks cable reveals
01.12.2010: NOT WORTH IT: Every Hellfire missile fired in Afghanistan costs USD58,000
01.12.2010: WikiLeaks cables: “US aid will not stop Pakistan supporting militants”
30.11.2010: Villagers claim deaths, complicating Afghan push
30.11.2010: Why is it getting worse for civilians in Afghanistan?
30.11.2010: Billions Down The Drain In Afghanistan
29.11.2010: Hungry for Some Truth on the Afghanistan War
29.11.2010: Afghanistan: The war on terrorism or permanent occupation?
27.11.2010: Number of Afghans pursuing asylum spikes, hinting at loss of hope for peaceful homeland
26.11.2010: Will WikiLeaks unravel the American “secret government”?
23.11.2010: Afghanistan injured cost government 500,000 Pound a week
22.11.2010: Australian security firm accused of Afghan corruption
22.11.2010: Pentagon blows up thousands of homes in Afghanistan
20.11.2010: Thousands protest against Afghanistan war
19.11.2010: The Murderous U.S. Government Explained
16.11.2010: Afghanistan No.1 victim of international terrorism: UN official
14.11.2010: Afghan People Suffering Under Powerful Elite Tied To Karzai, U.S.
08.11.2010: Violence takes a turn to the north
04.11.2010: 229 Afghan civilians killed in October: official
02.11.2010: Billions in Afghan aid fail to beat medieval disease

Latest

Most Viewed

Comments