Human Rights Watch, January 15, 2009
HRW: US Investigation of Airstrike Deaths in Azizabad ‘Deeply Flawed’
New Administration Should Revise Policies to Reduce Civilian Casualties
The US military’s investigation into deadly and controversial airstrikes in Azizabad in Afghanistan in August 2008 was deeply flawed, Human Rights Watch said today in a letter () to US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
An Afghan woman on on Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2008 holds a poster with photos of her family members, who were killed on August 22, 2008 during a US led raid in Azizabad village of Shindand district of Herat province.
More photos and list of the victims ( )
Photo Gallery of US victims in Afghanistan ( )
The Afghan Victim Memorial Project by Prof. Marc ( )
On October 1, 2008, the Department of Defense published a summary of a report by Brig. Gen. Michael Callan of its investigations into USairstrikes on the village of Azizabad in Herat province on August 21-22, 2008. Since that time, Human Rights Watch has conducted additional research into theevents surrounding the Azizabad airstrikes, reviewed the facts presented in the summary, and analyzed the Callan investigation’s methodology.
“The weaknesses in the Callan investigation call into question the Defense Department’s commitment to avoid civiliancasualties,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Unless the new Obama administration urgently addresses the US military’s airstrike practices in Afghanistan, more unnecessary civiliandeaths and injuries will result.”
Separate investigations conducted by the United Nations, the government of Afghanistan, and the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission concluded 78 to 92 civilians had been killed at Azizabad, the majority of them women and children. For weeks after the incident, the US strongly rejected all three investigations. An initial US military inquiry bythe Combined Joint Task Force 101 concluded that no more than five to seven civilians and 30 to 35 Taliban fighters had been killed. In various mediainterviews, US officials suggested that the villagers were spreading Taliban propaganda.
After the release of video showing significant numbers of civilian dead, and strong criticism from Afghan President Hamid Karzai and theUN, the US announced on September 7 that it would conduct a new investigation led by General Callan.
The Callan report summary accepted a larger figure for the number of dead – 33 civilians – but rejected the much higher civilian death tolls reported by the UN, the Afghan Independent Human RightsCommission, and the Afghan government, and criticized their methodology. It failed to acknowledge any flaws in the initial US assessments, and it dismissedvillager testimony as financially or politically motivated.
The summary concluded that the US attack on insurgent forces in Azizabad was “necessary” and “proportional,”failing to acknowledge any possible mistakes in US intelligence. It exonerated the US forces who carried out the attack of any wrongdoing without providing abasis for its conclusions, and suggested without evidence that Taliban forces deliberately used civilians as “shields.”
Flaws in the Callan investigation that may have led to a lower US estimate of civilians killed include: the dismissal of villager testimony about numbers killed, the rejection of consistent claims that some graves contained more than one body, and the assumption that almost all the men who died were insurgents.
“There was great hope in Afghanistan that the Callan report would provide a credible and detailed analysis of the Azizabad airstrikes, place blame where it fell, lead to appropriate disciplinary action, and result in operational changes that would avoid such tragedies in the future,” said Adams. “Unfortunately, this has not happened.”
Human Rights Watch recommended that the US government:
Human Rights Watch urged the Defense Department topublicly release the Callan report.
“We deeply regret the Pentagon’s decision notto declassify and publish the full report of the Azizabad investigation,”said Adams. “In the interests of bringing to public attention theinvestigation’s methodology, analysis, and findings, we urge DefenseSecretary Gates to reconsider that decision.”
Human Rights Watch said that the US and its allies havemade some positive operational changes and commitments to try to reducecivilian casualties, particularly in Tactical Directives issued on September 2and December 8 and in various statements to the media by political and militaryleaders.
“The US still needs to change its policies andpractices on airstrikes to end the string of attacks that have caused so muchloss of civilian life,” said Adams. “Otherwise the planned arrivalof 20-30,000 more troops in Afghanistan may lead to greater, not fewer,civilian deaths.”
In September 2008 Human Rights Watch issued a report onthe problem of civilian casualties from airstrikes, “‘Troops inContact’: Airstrikes and Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan” (http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2008/09/08/troops-contact-0 ( )),which made detailed recommendations of ways to avoid civilian casualties.
To read the letter from Human Rights Watch to US Defense Secretary Gates, please click here. ()
Characters Count: 8499